Best External Ssd For Vst Plugins

Posted By admin On 23.12.20

Get the 200 best free VST plugins ever made. From synth VSTs and drum VSTs to VST effects, this huge list has only the best of the best plugins. No other drum plugin has the range and versatility of SSD 5.5. With tons of legendary and artist-modeled drum kits in every style, your creative options are limitless. Whether you’re into rock, metal, jazz, funk, R&B, indie, reggae, or experimental, SSD 5.5 has you covered. In terms of system requirements, orchestra plug-ins and orchestral libraries can be equally demanding on disk space and RAM. Libraries are samples of live recordings, providing you the best recording you can get. We recommend you use an external hard drive or solid-state drive to save you libraries. For more about these options check out our. Live, like most DAWs, lets you tell it where your VST plugins are. If you’re using a Mac then things can be a bit complicated because there are also AU plugins to consider, should you decide to use them (Logic Pro only supports AU, not VST) and the system assumes the default install locations have been used - many/most plugin installers don’t give you an option to use anywhere else.

The market is teeming with storage choices, from relatively modest 500GB to 2TB models, to multi-terabyte models with capacities reaching into the double digits.

But finding the best hard drive for music production can come with its own challenges… Thunderbolt? USB type-C? Solid-state? Transfer speeds? etc. And with hard drive storage being cheaper and more accessible than in the past, there’s no reason why you shouldn’t invest in a couple of external drives to back up your valuable data, archive your projects, or free up space on your internal drive.

So in this post, we’ll take a look at the top hard drives and solid state drives that you ought be using.

Top 5 External Storage Drives for Producers

Samsung Portable SSD T5

See Price @ Amazon

The Samsung T5 is one of the latest and most impressive SDDs, it’s known for fast transfer speeds and the durability to hold up against the most demanding environments. It is available in several colors and fits neatly into your pocket or purse, giving you dependable storage wherever you go.

Specs and features

The T5 uses Samsung’s V-NAND flash memory technology and has a USB 3.1 Gen 2 interface onboard. With transfer speeds of up to 540 MB/s, it is 4.9 times faster than comparable HDDs. Large project files, multi-gigabyte audio, high-resolution photos, and even 4K videos transfer within minutes, so you don’t have to spend a lot of time backing up and archiving your precious data.

The fast transfer speed translates to smooth and effortless streaming as well. If you don’t want to clog up your computer’s internal drive with gigs and gigs of sample libraries, you can stream them from the T5 without so much as a hiccup. Of course, you do need to have a USB 3.1 Gen 2 port on your computer and enable UASP mode. But once you set everything up, you can pretty much rely on the T5 to stream your audio flawlessly.

Like all SDDs, the T5 does not have moving parts, which goes a long way in ensuring durability and reliability. Even so, the circuitry is protected by a sturdy metal casing that has been drop-tested from a height of two meters. Unless you are in the habit of drop-kicking your external drives, it’s safe to say that the T5 will handle even the most rigorous studio use.

The T5 is compatible with Macs and PCs, and even smartphones and gaming consoles. It comes with USB Type-C to C and USB Type-C to A cables for maximum connectivity options.

User impressions

Music producers find the T5 to be an excellent budget-friendly storage option. Some have purchased it thinking that they would get only a minimal speed boost but were surprised to see how much it shortened loading times. The performance boost was even more noticeable when loading up large project files from the drive.

Bottom-line

With a maximum capacity of 2TB, the Samsung T5 isn’t the largest drive around. Nevertheless, the speed and performance make up for the somewhat modest space, and it is inexpensive enough so that you could get a few for backup and archiving purposes.

Watch the Demo

Glyph StudioRAID Thunderbolt 2

See Price @ Amazon or Sweetwater

The Glyph StudioRAID Thunderbolt 2 is billed as a “production-grade” external raid hard drive, which is intended to speed up and enhance workflow. Quite an excellent choice for studio musicians, video editors, and anyone that needs rugged and reliable storage, the Glyph StudioRAID is especially suitable for backing up large DAW files, rendered audio, and humongous sample libraries.

Specs and features

The Glyph StudioRAID supports Thunderbolt 2, which gives you a comfortable level of future-proofing. It also has USB 3.0 connectivity, so it will work with a wide variety of devices and configurations. But what really speeds up its performance is the support for current hardware RAID modes, including 1, 0, JBOD, and SPAN. This versatility gives you quick and seamless access to your digital library.

Right out of the box, the Glyph StudioRAID is formatted for HFS+ with Journaling and Time Machine compatibility. If you are planning on using it on a Windows machine, you simply have to reformat the drive beforehand, which should take only a few minutes at most.

Like all respectable external hard drives, the Glyph StudioRAID comes in a robust metal enclosure, which protects it against the most determined bumps and jostles. It also has a built-in heavy-duty power supply and auto-sensing power feature, so you can pretty much just plug it in and get to work.

Other features include a soft-touch power switch and disk health monitoring. The Glyph StudioRAID supports drive capacities from 2TB to 28TB, so you can choose from cost-effective storage to near-limitless capacity.

User impressions

Users of the StudioRAID have a great deal of confidence in Glyph, considering the company is one of the few that makes storage devices specifically for studio professionals. In most cases, the StudioRAID outperformed the closest competitor by a wide margin, streaming as much as 350MB per second. For handling multiple audio streams, the Glyph StudioRAID has proven to be unbeatable for many users.

Bottom-line

The Glyph StudioRAID is admittedly a bit expensive, but you can’t put a price on quality. Everything about the unit is noticeably high-quality, from the performance to the all-metal enclosure. If you want a dependable storage device that you can rely on for years, the StudioRAID is a great choice.

Watch the Demo

Glyph Atom SSD 1TB USB-C

See Price @ Amazon or Sweetwater

If your needs are more modest, the Glyph Atom SSD is an excellent alternative to the monstrous multi-terabyte drives currently flooding the market. Offering up to 2TB of storage, it is better suited for transferring files and taking them on-the-go rather than archiving and sound library streaming. Even so, the Atom’s features and trademark performance capabilities make it an essential studio tool that will find plenty of use in your rig.

Specs and features

Like its bigger brother, the Glyph StudioRAID, the minuscule Atom boasts of Thunderbolt 3 capability and USB-C 3.1 Generation 2 compatibility. It is also HFS+ preformatted right out of the box, with Journaling and Time Machine support. Like the StudioRAID, a quick reformat is all it takes to get it communicating with your Windows machine.

Where the Atom differs is in its form factor. Amazingly compact and lightweight, this will hardly take up any space on your desktop, sitting unobtrusively next to your studio computer. But even with its minute dimensions, the Atom delivers impressive performance, streaming data at a blinding rate of 560MB per second. You could easily drag and drop gigabytes of audio files to it all day and not lose precious minutes in the studio.

The Atom comes in an all-aluminum enclosure, which provides sufficient protection under most conditions. It is bus-powered too so you won’t have to wrestle with a bulky, space-eating power supply. And for maximum connectivity, the Atom comes with a USB-C to USB-C (3.1) and a USB-C to USB 3.0 cable.

The Atom is available in capacities from 250GB to 2TB.

User impressions

Unsurprisingly, most users of the Atom find it to be just as impressive as its bigger capacity brothers. Many are especially impressed at how much power and performance they can harness with a single USB cable, with no power supply in sight. As expected, the Atom is totally silent, and many users report being unaware that it is on if not for the bright LED light. Audio and video work is notoriously demanding on hard drives, but the Atom keeps up like a champ.

Bottom-line

The Atom is a cost-effective solution for most storage and data transferring needs. It is inexpensive enough that you could simply purchase one for every major project you are working on. This is often preferable to relying on larger drives that could fail and take all your data with them.

LaCie Rugged Thunderbolt USB 3.0

See Price @ Amazon or Sweetwater

LaCie has long been known for its reliability and performance, and the aptly-named Rugged is no different. Upholding the proud LaCie tradition admirably, the Rugged is the near-perfect solution for most every data storage need in the modern music production studio. With features such as USB 3.0 and Thunderbolt connectivity, the Rugged is well up the challenge of the most demanding music applications.

Specs and features

LaCie proudly proclaims the Rugged to be one of the fastest bus-powered storage devices currently available. This claim is no idle boast, as the USB 3.0 and Thunderbolt connectivity allows you to stream huge audio and video files without a hitch. In fact, the Rugged is designed to give you the perfect balance between speed, durability, and mobility.

The durability comes into play with the Rugged’s ability to withstand drops from up to two meters, which should cover most typical studio situations. The drive also has IP 54-level protection against water and dust, so you can be sure that your data will remain intact even if you subject your equipment to rough and rugged road conditions.

Ssd

The availability of USB 3.0 and Thunderbolt ports also ensures maximum compatibility with Macs and PCs. Whether you are looking for additional storage for your laptop or a quick and easy way to transfer files between remote computers, the Rugged is an ideal solution.

LaCie has seen fit to integrate the Thunderbolt cable into the drive’s casing, so it is always there when you need it. A seemingly minor innovation to be sure, but it does help you avoid having to hunt for a Thunderbolt cable, which isn’t currently ubiquitous in many studios yet.

User impressions

LaCie drives tend to attract serious studio professionals in the video and audio industries. The Rugged certainly doesn’t disappoint, with its fast and reliable performance in a portable and convenient form factor. In numerous real-world test scenarios, the Rugged has consistently proven its ability to mount quickly and stream data without issues.

Bottom-line

The LaCie Rugged ticks all the boxes when it comes to reliable and convenient storage. It also comes with an attractive price tag, making it worthy of serious consideration for anyone looking for an inexpensive but dependable external hard drive.

Watch the Demo

G-Technology 1TB G-DRIVE

See Price @ Amazon or Sweetwater

G-Technology’s G-DRIVE delivers all the reliability and performance you would expect from a state-of-the-art SSD drive at a price that won’t break the bank. One of the most rugged external drives you will find at this price point, it even measures up against costlier models with its modern connectivity and data protection features.

Specs and features

With transfer speeds of up to 560MB per second, the G-DRIVE easily measures up to the demands of modern audio and video production environments. Even the largest data files zip back and forth within minutes, so you don’t have to waste too much time on the necessary-but-tedious tasks of backing up and archiving.

The G-DRIVE has a USB-C port with support for USB 3.1 Gen 2 interfaces, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of desktop and laptop computers.

So far, so good. But where the G-DRIVE really leaves the competition behind is in its innovative data and mechanism protection features that ensure the utmost integrity of your file content. While most external drives are drop-tested to a height of two meters, the G-DRIVE is tested for three-meter drop protection. It also has a 1,000-pound crushproof rating and has IP67 protection against water and dust.

Enclosing the drive is an aluminum core casing that prevents overheating even at peak performance. This casing also serves to insulate the drive when it isn’t being used.

The G-DRIVE is available in capacities ranging from 500GB to 2TB.

User impressions

Many users found the G-DRIVE to be even faster than other higher-spec’d drives with similar capacities. The difference isn’t night and day, but it does give many users a sense of gratification knowing that superior performance is available at a slightly lower cost from a lesser-known brand.

The G-DRIVE’s small form factor also scored points among home studio owners who don’t have a lot of desk space to spare. And with its proven protection features, the G-DRIVE is even well-suited for the demands of the road.

Bottom-line

Ruggedness and reliability are what the G-DRIVE is all about, and it even delivers admirably in terms of speed. At this price point, the market is pretty much crowded with excellent external drive options. Even so, the G-DRIVE has what it takes to make it a serious contender.

How to Choose the Best External Storage Drive?

HDD vs. SDD

When choosing an external drive, the choice often comes down to hard disk drives (HDDs) or solid-state drives (SDDs). The traditional option is HDDs, which are cheaper and come with larger storage capacities. The downside is that HDDs are much more prone to damage when dropped or bumped, which could result in data loss. They are also heavier than SDDs, consume more energy, and have shorter lifespans. Even so, a good HDD from a reputable manufacturer should last for many years if you take good care of it.

SSDs are capable of faster performance, although this usually isn’t a crucial factor for external drives. The best HDDs should be able to stream large audio files and sample libraries just fine for most purposes. In any case, SDDs generally have longer lifespans than HDDs. They are also lighter and run cooler. On the downside, they are more expensive than HDDs, especially when you go for multi-terabyte models.

Size and form factor

HDDs typically come in 3.5-inch and 2.5-inch sizes. Most external drives that come in dedicated enclosures contain 2.5” drives, such as the ones commonly used in laptops. You could, of course, purchase either a 3.5” or a 2.5” drive and place it in a suitable enclosure. This is usually a more cost-effective alternative to buying an external drive that comes in a dedicated enclosure, and you have a wider variety of disk capacities to choose from.

Traditionally, the main difference between the two form factors is that 3.5” HDDs can hold much more data. But this isn’t necessarily the case anymore, as recent advances in technology have made it possible to store close to an equivalent amount of data in a 2.5” drive. One thing that hasn’t changed though is that most 3.5” external drives still require a dedicated power supply, while most 2.5” drives can be powered off a USB port.

Connection type

All external drives connect to your computer via USB cables, whether they are HDDs or SSDs. But even USB connectors come in a few different types. Most older drives use Mini-B USB cables, which only works with USB 1.1 and USB 2.0 ports and devices.

The newer standard is Micro-B, which works with USB 3.0. Keep in mind that this cable isn’t backward compatible with USB 1.1 or 2.0.

There is also a Type-C USB cable, which supports USB 3.0, as well as all earlier USB versions. An added benefit is that you can insert this type of cable in any direction, so you won’t have to keep flipping the connector over to plug your external hard drive in!

Newer Type-C USB connectors work with Thunderbolt technology, which was initially compatible only with Apple devices. Thunderbolt 3 is now compatible with PCs, but keep in mind that while Thunderbolt devices work with all Type-C USB connectors, not all Type-C connectors support Thunderbolt.

If you want to future-proof your storage capabilities, you should, at the very least, go for an external drive that has a Type-C connector. Better still, look into a hard drive that supports Thunderbolt technology.

Storage capacity

The largest capacity HDDs you could get go up to 12TB or more. There are even larger capacity drives that can go up to 15 or 16TB, but these are generally intended for enterprise applications.

SDD drives were initially limited to smaller capacities, but you can now find SSDs capable of multi-terabyte storage. There is even an SSD that stores as much as 16TB of data, but as with HDDs, these are better suited for enterprise applications.

In any case, it is generally a good idea to go for external drives in the 4TB to 8TB range and divide your data between a few of them. This will provide you with enough storage space for all your projects, sample libraries, and backups, without costing you too much money. And with relatively smaller drives, there is less risk of losing all your data to a damaged single drive.

Transfer speed

Vst Plugins For Fl Studio

Transfer speed is an important concern if you plan on streaming audio files, samples, and sample libraries from your external hard drive. A 7200 RPM drive will allow you to stream data much faster and with fewer hiccups than a 5400 RPM drive.

Transfer speed is less of an issue if you are planning on using your external drive only for backing up project files. Even so, it is probably best to go with a 7200 RPM drive as the cost difference over a 5400 RPM drive is marginal.

Failure rate

One other aspect you should look into is failure rate. SDDs do not have any moving parts, so they would theoretically last longer than HDDs. But if you plan on using your external drive only for backups and archives and don’t run it continuously, you should be able to get many years of use out of it before you have to think about looking for a replacement.

Best Vst Plugins For Reason


SSD vs HDD drives for VST
Forum Index » Pre-Sales Questions
Message
Subject:SSD vs HDD drives for VST
brent mosher
Presonic
Joined: 15/03/2012 17:17:48
Messages: 277
Offline

I am just getting started with Studio One and computer recording. Here is the computer I bought:
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-Z68AP-D3
CPU Intel i7 2600 Dual Core/ 3.4Gig
Memory DDR3 Corsair/16 Gig RAM PC 1600
Hard Drive WD 1TB @ 7200rpm/Black
Video Gigabyte HD6570/1gig
DVDRW Asus 24x
Sound Sound Max AC3 5.1
Ethernet Reltek 10/100/1000
Case/PS Antec Sonata/with 400Watt SPI
Keyboard Logitech MK200
Mouse Logitech MK200
Monitior Asus LED 19” VH198T
O.S Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit
I am going to purchase NI Komplete Ultimate and Omnispere, total of 300GB. I may purchase other VSTi's in the future. I was advised a separate SSD would be a better option for these instruments. My other two options would be to load these onto my current 1TB HDD, or get a separate HDD just for VSTs like these two. I also need to buy a separate HDD for backup/archive, so, in my world, this is starting to get a little pricey. Is there a signifigant advantage in terms of speed and performance with SSD over HDD as a platform for the VST library? And what SSD would you recommend? I am looking at the Crucial M4 and the CorsairForce GT CSSD. Are there others that would be better and why?
Also, I understand constant writing to an SSD can cause it to wear quickly. But I am assuming that the occasional program upgrade (say to Komplete) are not considered excessive? And, while it seems putting the instruments on a SSD is a good idea, is the same true for the effects processors? Or could they be put on the OS drive with Studio One? And, while I see many are opting to put their OS on an SSD, is there really any advantage to be gained from doing that, that couldn't be gained by upgrading your processor as the newest and fastest become available?
Thank you for your interest and replies.

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 13/04/2012 19:13:38

Subject:Re:SSD vs HD drives
DIEL01
Prenoob
Joined: 03/04/2012 10:39:32
Messages: 25
Offline

SSD would reduce sample load times, I've just got a 256GB for OS and progs but its a brand new build so not fully up and running yet.
Subject:Re:SSD vs HD drives
gadget69
Presonificator
Joined: 21/09/2010 03:56:19
Messages: 5008
Location: Northern Mn
Offline

The speed is phenomenal on SSD's...the storage amount is low, and had one, it failed VERY quickly...
NOTE: If your having an issue, open a tech support ticket and bring the number here if you want help!
http://support.presonus.com
Tools:
OHCI tool and Latency mon:
http://forums.presonus.com/posts/list/11348.page
We, the few, that have done so much, for so long that now we can do everyything with nothing
dbx forum moderator
Lenova Ideapad Z565
Best connectivity Express card/firewire 2 port (400) that does NOT suggest having the TI chipset. (always worked great)
BYTECC Express card (400/800)07150358281
Asus/AMD processor tower. This setups just works on all firewire devices.
Belkin N450 dual band router, works with SL and Ai mixers
Studiolive 16:4:2
SL Ai24.4.2
ABUSB 1818VSL
Faderport
USB pre interface
Studio one Pro V2
LABsubs
loads of audio, and studio gear, and audiophile sound gear (gearslut)
Subject:Re:SSD vs HD drives
douglasjordan
Prenoob
Joined: 13/04/2012 05:49:00
Messages: 43
Location: USA
Offline

Using an SSD for fast read only data is ideal. Occasional file updates will not cause premature wear. You should expect an SSD with typical read/write usage to last longer than the computer you put it in, 10 years or more. Wear leveling in an SSD is based on writes and capacity used/free. The more bytes used the less there will be for wear leveling.
Subject:Re:SSD vs HDD drives for VST
brent mosher
Presonic
Joined: 15/03/2012 17:17:48
Messages: 277
Offline

Thank you for the replies. For anyone who is interested, I reached a compromise and went with two 10,000 rpm Velociraptor 600 GB HDDs. One for my OS and S1, and the other for my VST library. The 1TB HDD installed when I bought the computer will be used for recording. In a year's time, perhaps I will upgrade the 600 GB HDDs to SSDs, depending on how much the price has come down on them and how my system performs in its current state.
Subject:Re:SSD vs HDD drives for VST
douglasjordan
Prenoob
Joined: 13/04/2012 05:49:00
Messages: 43
Location: USA
Offline

Too bad you could not wait a bit longer, the new 1TB VelociRaptor drives were announced.
Subject:Re:SSD vs HDD drives for VST
brent mosher
Presonic
Joined: 15/03/2012 17:17:48
Messages: 277
Offline

douglasjordan wrote:Too bad you could not wait a bit longer, the new 1TB VelociRaptor drives were announced.

Oh...well...I just ordered them and they won't even arrive in the country until the 24th. So I could upgrade. Thanks for the tip, I'll have to think about it. 600GB is lots for the OS and S1, though. And the VSTs are only about 342GB, so...I might save my money now for the SSDs later.
Subject:Re:SSD vs HDD drives for VST
rnaqvi
Presonic
Joined: 16/04/2009 14:36:28
Messages: 459
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Offline

SSD's will only get bigger and more robust. I don't have personal experience with them right now as far as music is concerned, but I've contemplated replacing my internal laptop drive with one.
Rick Naqvi
VP of Sales
rnaqvi@presonus.com
Subject:Re:SSD vs HDD drives for VST
cristofe
Presonificator
Joined: 12/03/2012 21:10:44
Messages: 3628
Location: Skaneateles, NY USA
Offline

rnaqvi wrote:SSD's will only get bigger and more robust. I don't have personal experience with them right now as far as music is concerned, but I've contemplated replacing my internal laptop drive with one.


PC'S: HP XW6000 Dual 3.2GHz Intel Xeon Processors, 8GB RAM WinXP SP2
HP 6005 Pro AMD Athalon X2 B24 3.0Ghz Processor, 4GB RAM Win8 Pro
HP Compaq NC6320 Laptop Intel Core2Duo 2.0Ghz Processor 3GB RAM Win7 Ult
Dell Latitude E4310 Laptop Intel i5 2.67Ghz Processor 4GB RAM Win7 Pro x32
Audio Interfaces: Terratec EWS88MT PCI (2), Audiobox 1818VSL USB & FP10 Firewire, Steinberg MI4 USB, Line 6 Toneport GX & PodXT, Roland GS-10, NI Rig Kontrol 3
Monitors: Yamaha HS50M's
DAWS/VST Hosts: S1 Professional, Plogue Bidule, Xlutop Chainer, Sieb VSTHost & Savihost
Hardware Synthesizers: Roland SH-32 & XV-3080 RedSound Darkstar XP2, Novation X-Station, Yamaha AN200, M-Audio Venom
Hardware Controllers: JL Cooper CS-10 Control Surface, Yamaha EZ-EG, Dillion Les Paul style acoustic electric guitar with Roland GK-3 pickup and GI-20 converter.
The Rest: Guitars, Amps, Stompboxes, Mics, Outboard Gear, VST plugins...too much to list!
Subject:Re:SSD vs HDD drives for VST
Jason.Harris
Presonoid
Joined: 01/10/2010 16:19:09
Messages: 1649
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Offline

I'm using one of the Maxtor XT Hybrid drives right now in my laptop and I love it. Its 500gb, with (i believe) 8gb of SSD as a buffer and runs at 7200rpm. It was a big jump over my 320gb 5400 rpm drive!
Still, I would like to use an internal SSD at around 250+GB and have a secondary (probably external) 7200rpm drive.
Cheers,
Jason

Subject:SSD vs HDD drives for VST
MitchInOmaha
Presonic
Joined: 04/10/2011 21:25:25
Messages: 178
Location: Nebraska
Offline

I, too, have a hybrid drive like Jason. My drive was starting to flake out, so when I replaced it, I got the hybrid. My old drive was already a 7200RPM drive, so I didn't feel a huge jump in performance.
When I run a performance benchmark, I do get a slight edge over the old drive (I installed the old drive as a second drive in my laptop), but overall, I don't see a ton of improvement. Maybe I should revert to the old drive just to see how much I lose.
-- Mitch
Behringer X32
Audiobox VSL 22
Tascam US-1800
Windows 7, Dell Studio 17 Laptop, i7, 6Gb
StudioOne 2 Professional
Father of the next big name guitar player.
Subject:Re:SSD vs HDD drives for VST
rjb
Prenoob
Joined: 26/04/2012 08:59:59
Messages: 1
Offline

I have a studiolive 16.0.2, macbook pro 13inch osx 10.6.8 with a 120gb ssd intel310. Works lightning fast. Recording 16 tracks to ssd and playback from ssd, no problem at all.
I would recommend it. As for failing, no problems so far
RJB
Subject:Re:SSD vs HDD drives for VST
minnikin32
Presonic
Joined: 29/07/2010 00:14:45
Messages: 136
Location: North East UK
Offline

I have SSD Drives in both my Macs and have no trouble recording, playback, or doing anything with them. They are just soooo fast! Had them for quite a while now.
LIVE/MOBILE RECORDING RIG
Presonus StudioLive 16:4:2
JBL PRX612M x 2
dB Technologies SUB15 x 4
Apple iPad 1G 16GB WiFi
Apple Mac Mini 2010 (P8600, OSX 10.7.4, 8GB DDR3, 256GB Crucial M4 SSD)
Apple Logic Pro 9
Apple Airport Express (802.11n version)
HOME RIG
Apple iMac 27' 2011 (2.7GHz i5 Quad, OSX 10.7.4, 16GB DDR3, 256GB Intel SSD, 1TB HDD)
Apple Logic Pro 9
Presonus Firestudio Mobile
Presonus Firestudio Project
Subject:Re:SSD vs HDD drives for VST
readyrover
Prenoob
Joined: 16/04/2011 20:42:11
Messages: 16
Offline

I did a lot of research as I am training in the IT field on using a smaller SSD for OS and a larger mechanical drive for storage.
This only works for Win 7. There may be similar solutions in other OS but I don't know of any yet.
What I came up with isn't for everyone, but works like lightning. I have a 64gig SSD (sata ii...because it's impossible to tell the difference in real time between 'sssssst!' and 'sssssssst!' as the bits fly by) and a 500gig 7200 data drive.
The trick is in moving the Users and Program Data folders to the 2nd drive so the ssd doesn't fill up. This works best on a clean install and involves editing the installation with a script on the 2nd drive. The
The result is: every time I download a multi-gigabyte sample file, if I am asked where to download I let it assume C:UsersDownloads...but the file actually goes to the larger drive in the E:UsersDownloads file.
I have been running this way since last October and have a max of 29 gigs on the 64gig ssd...but with all the blazing load and read times...Quad core AM3...8gig ram...and have tried maxxing out the system and so far can't be done....over a hundred tracks with effects, etc and no lag, no problems...
If you do this the wrong way, it will hurt!
So, here is the link and I suggest you read all 7 pages of comments and back and forth before you begin...should you want to go this route.
http://www.sevenforums.com/tutorials/124198-user-profiles-create-move-during-windows-7-installation.html
I will eventually just get a large ssd, but at the time I got the ssd and 500g hd for about $100 and money was a prime issue. Still, this method will work and regardless of the mechanical drive speed....you CAN tell the ssd difference if you do your research and buy a reliable one and set it up according to MFGrs specs. They just smoke!
Subject:Re:SSD vs HDD drives for VST
jamusic
Presonic
Joined: 05/11/2010 10:28:43
Messages: 365
Location: Near Vancouver - British Columbia, Canada
Offline

I built my own rig for the first time in October, 2011, and started with a 64 G SSD [Crucial M4], but have since added a 128 G SSD [Crucial M4], which holds my 2 DAWs - Studio One Professional v2, & Sonar X1d Expanded, and ALL my plugins & related programs.
I have an internal 1TB Western Digital 'Black' drive, that I don't really use now, and an external 1TB Western Digital USB 3.0 drive that I use to save my songs, projects & templates to, as well as some documents.
My 128 G SSD [it's actually 119 G] still has about half capacity left, which is good.
I read that SSDs run faster when less crowded.
I've had zero failures with either of my SSDs.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 12/06/2012 09:28:39

Inside every old Man...........is a younger Man wondering..........'What the hell happened?!'
Intel Core i7-2600K CPU - 3.4 Ghz * 16 Gigs Ram * 240G, 128G, 64G SSDs * Triple Monitors
Windows 7-64 Bit * StudioLive 16.4.2 Mixer * TC Electronics SK48 * Studio One Professional v2.5 * Sonar X2a Producer
Neumann TLM 103 * DBX 376 Compressor/PreAmp * ART DPSII PreAmp * Roland UM-550 MIDI Patchbay
Event ASP-6 & Roland MA-15D Speakers * Novation ReMote 37 SL * Yamaha P-200 Piano * RP-X Piano Module
1995 - 4003 FireGlow Rickenbacker * 6 Guitars * TD-6 V-Drums * Roland P-330 Piano Module
Yamaha MU90R * Korg O5R/W * Roland M-SE-1 String Ensemble * Korg EX-8000 [DW-8000] Module
Forum Index » Pre-Sales Questions